Caring for the Church

December 31st 

…apart from such external things, there is the daily pressure on me of concern for all the churches. Who is weak without my being weak? Who is led into sin without my intense concern?

2 Corinthians 11:28-29 (NASB)

And it will be said in that day, “Behold, this is our God for whom we have waited that He might save us. This is the LORD for whom we have waited; Let us rejoice and be glad in His salvation.”

Isaiah 25:9 (NASB)

They that trust in the Lord shall never be confounded! Some who helped for a while may fall asleep in Jesus; others may grow cold in the service of the Lord; others may be as desirous as ever to help, but have no longer the means; others may have both a willing heart to help, and have also the means, but may see it the Lord’s will to lay them out in another way;—and thus, from one cause or another, were we to lean upon man, we should surely be confounded; but, in leaning upon the living God alone, We are BEYOND disappointment, and BEYOND being forsaken because of death, or want[lack] of means, or want of love, or because of the claims of other work. How precious to have learned in any measure to stand with God alone in the world, and yet to be happy, and to know that surely no good thing shall be withheld from us whilst we walk uprightly!

…language cannot express the real joy in God which I had. I was free from excitement. The circumstance did not un-fit me even for a single moment to attend to my other engagements. I was not in the least surprised, because, by grace, my soul had been waiting on God for deliverance. Never had help been so long delayed.

…Our desire, therefore, is not that we may be without trials of faith, but that the Lord graciously would be pleased to support us in the trial, that we may not dishonour Him by distrust.

from George Müller’s Narrative (Pt. 2)


Today is, apparently, the Feast of the mysterious St. Slyvester, whom we don’t know much of anything about, other than the fact that he was pope during the time of Constantine, and stories about the two of them were used as a sort of totem whenever anyone wanted some propaganda that asserted papal supremacy.  And he was absent from the only event from this period of church history that anyone remembers and simply sent representatives to the Council of Nicaea.  And he’s also associated with a super-famous forgery.

But basically nothing.

Probably the last Kierkegaard post, so enjoy it

December 29th 

…you say, ‘If we had been living in the days of our fathers, we would not have been partners with them in shedding the blood of the prophets.’

Matthew 23:30 (NASB)

A living generation often believes itself able to pass judgment on a past generation, because it misunderstood the Good… At some later date, it is no art to decorate the graves of the noble and to say, “If they had only lived now,” now — just as we are starting in to do the same thing against a contemporary.

The view of the moment is the opinion which in an earthly and ‘busy’ sense decides whether a man accomplishes anything or not. And in this sense, nothing in the world has ever been so completely lost as was Christianity at the time that Christ was crucified. And in the understanding of the moment, never in the world has anyone accomplished so little by the sacrifice of a consecrated life as did Jesus Christ. And yet in this same instant, eternally understood, He had accomplished all. For He did not foolishly judge by the result that was not yet there, or more rightly (for here is the conflict and battleground of the two interpretations of what is meant by “accomplishing”) the result was indeed there.

Question His contemporaries, if you ever meet them. Do they not say of the crucified one, “The fool, he would help others and he cannot help himself, but now the outcome also shows, so that everyone may see what he was.”

Was it not said by His contemporaries, especially where the clever led the conversation, “The fool, he who had it in his power to become king if he cared to make use of his opportunity, if he had only half my cleverness, he would have been king. In the beginning I really believed that it was ingenuity, that he let these people express themselves in this fashion without wishing to give himself up to them. I believed it was a trick. But now the result shows clearly enough what I more recently have myself been quite clear about, that he is a shallow, blind visionary!” Was it not said by many intelligent men and women, “The result shows that he has been hunting after phantasies; he should have married. In this way he would now have been a distinguished teacher in Israel.”

And yet, eternally understood, the crucified one had in the same moment accomplished all! But the view of the moment and the view of eternity over the same matter have never stood in such atrocious opposition. It can never be repeated. This could happen only to Him. Yet eternally understood, He had in the same moment accomplished all, and on that account said, with eternity’s wisdom, “It is finished.”

Perhaps it would require many centuries before He would be able to say that in regard to temporal existence. Yet what He is still unable to say after the passage of eighteen triumphant centuries, He said in His own age, eighteen centuries ago, in the very moment when all was lost. Eternally understood, He said, “It is finished.” “It is finished.” He said that just when the mass of the people, and the priests, and the Roman soldiers, Herod and Pilate, and the idle ones on the street, the crowd in the gateway, and the newspaper reporters (if there were any such at that time) in short, when all the powers of the moment, however different their sentiments might have been, were agreed upon this view of the matter: that all was lost, hopelessly lost. “It is finished,” He said, nailed to the cross as He was.

from Kierkegaard’s Purity of Heart is to Will One Thing (Ch. 8)

‘…and you can do good for them whenever you wish’

December 26th – Feast of St. Stephen

He who has pity on the poor lends to the LORD, And He will pay back what he has given..

Proverbs 19:17 (NKJV)

“If I have kept the poor from their desire,
Or caused the eyes of the widow to fail,
Or eaten my morsel by myself,
So that the fatherless could not eat of it
(But from my youth I reared him as a father,
And from my mother’s womb I guided the widow);
If I have seen anyone perish for lack of clothing,
Or any poor man without covering;
If his heart has not blessed me,
And if he was not warmed with the fleece of my sheep;
If I have raised my hand against the fatherless,
When I saw I had help in the gate;
Then let my arm fall from my shoulder,
Let my arm be torn from the socket…

“If I have made gold my hope,
Or said to fine gold, ‘You are my confidence’;
If I have rejoiced because my wealth was great,
And because my hand had gained much;*
…This also would be an iniquity deserving of judgment,
For I would have denied God who is above.

“If my land cries out against me,
And its furrows weep together;
If I have eaten its fruit without money,
Or caused its owners to lose their lives;
Then let thistles grow instead of wheat,
And weeds instead of barley.”

Job 31:16-25, 28, 38-40 (NKJV)


*Admittedly, this is followed by a passage about idolatry, but it interrupted the flow so… *snip snip* Heheh.

On this the second day of Christmas, I remembered that Feast of St. Stephen is traditionally a day for giving to the poor, and, as such, is associated with Good King Wenceslas. Here is the Irish Rovers’ version on Youtube and Spotify, because it’s virtually impossible to play this song straight. (Fun fact: the reason the music sounds about seven hundred years old is because it is; it was a Spring carol  -which actually has much better lyrics- and then some weirdo Victorian decided to totally confuse everyone by making it a sort of limping Christmas carol.) 

So oops… we have one more carol. If I were really evil, I would wait and spring it on you in January, on whatever the Eastern Orthodox date is (the 8th, I think), but this was always meant to be a one year thing, and I’d hate for my trolling to be the last thing on here.

Additionally, here is the Sinfonia of the 2nd day of Part 2 of Bach’s Christmas Oratorio BWV248. (Possibly overdone, but it’s frankly thrilling to me that there is no German in this part of the oratorio. In the famous words of whoever wrote the screenplay for Amadeus: “…it’s too brutal.”)

I honestly have no idea what this Feast consists of, but I’m pretty sure it’s not actually about socks

December 6th, The Feast of St. Nicholas

But whoever has this world’s goods, and sees his brother in need, and shuts up his heart from him, how does the love of God abide in him?

1 John 3:17 (NKJV)

The double-minded person may have a feeling for the Good. If someone should speak of the Good, especially if it were done in a poetical fashion, then he is quickly moved, easily stimulated to melt away in emotion. Suppose the world goes a little against him and then someone should tell him that God is love, that His love surpasses all understanding, encompassing in His Providence even the sparrow that may not fall to the earth without His willing it. If a person speaks in this way, especially in a poetical manner, he is gripped. He reaches after faith as after a desire, and with faith he clutches for the desired help. But perhaps the help is delayed. Instead of it a sufferer comes to him whom he can help. But this sufferer finds him impatient, forbidding. This sufferer must be content with the excuse, “that he is not at the moment in the spirit or the mood to concern himself about the suffering of others as he himself has troubles.” And yet he imagines that he has faith, faith that there is a loving Providence who helps the sufferer, a Providence, who also uses men as his instruments. Possibly now the desired help comes. Again he quickly flares up with gratitude, basking in a soft conception of the loving Goodness of Providence. Now he thinks he has rightly grasped faith. Now it has been victorious in him over every doubt and every objection. Alas, that other sufferer has been completely forgotten. Suppose that there should be talk of objections to faith… then that other sufferer has an even more powerful objection. But the double-minded one is wholly blind to the fact that at the very moment when he believes faith to have conquered in him, he has, precisely by his action, refuted this conviction.

Suppose then, that there was another man, whose life, by devoted love, was an instrument in the hand of Providence, so that he helped many suffering ones, although the help he himself had wished continued to be denied him from year to year. Which of these two was in truth convinced that there is a loving Providence that cares for the suffering ones? …He whose life is sacrificing love shall he not trust that God is love?

from Kierkegaard’s Purity of Heart Is to Will One Thing (Ch. 7) 


Side note: if you are reading this K, this does not mean you’re not allowed to buy shoes. 😉

Another side note: as Dumbledore was aware, (new) socks are actually a great thing to give away, because it’s something people don’t always think of, like diapers. Also, I knew this before it was cool and there were commercials for it.


Anyway, here’s Give Good Gifts One To Another on Youtube and Spotify

…and here is an image of a protostellar jet  from last year’s Hubble Advent Calendar in The Atlantic.

Here’s this year’s, if anyone’s interested.

Season of Giving

January 5th 

 For there will never cease to be poor in the land. Therefore I command you, ‘You shall open wide your hand to your brother, to the needy and to the poor, in your land.’

Deuteronomy 15:11 (ESV)

For some time past it has appeared to me that the words “Ye have the poor with you always, and whensoever ye will ye may do them good,” which the Lord spoke to His disciples, who were themselves very poor, imply that the children of God, as such, have power with God to bring temporal blessings upon poor saints or poor unbelievers, through the instrumentality of prayer. Accordingly I have been led to ask the Lord for means to assist poor saints; and at different times He has stirred up His children to intrust me with sums both large and small, for that especial object; or has, by some means or other, put money at my disposal, which I might so use. In like manner I had been asking again for means a few days since, to be able more extensively to assist the poor saints in communion with us, as just now many of them are not merely tried by the usual temporal difficulties arising from its being winter, but especially from the high price of bread. And now this evening the Lord has given me the answer to my prayer. When I came home from the meeting, I found a brother at my house who offered to give me 10l. a week, for twelve weeks, towards providing the poor saints with coals and needful articles of clothing, but chiefly with bread. [Accordingly… very many, especially poor widows, were greatly assisted, chiefly with flour and bread. This money just lasted till the price of bread was reduced from 9 1/2d. to 7 1/2d. Thus, for several weeks, about 150 quarterns of bread were distributed weekly, besides what was given in flour, coals, and clothes. I have mentioned this circumstance as an encouragement to those who either have little or nothing at all to give to poor persons, and who yet have a desire to give; and to those who have means, but whose means are not adequate to relieve all the demands made upon them. Had we more grace to plead the words of our Lord, above referred to, we should receive far more from Him to meet the necessities around us.]

Pause a few moments, dear reader! Not once does He forget us! Not once is our need only half supplied! Not once do His supplies come too late! Dear reader, if you have not the like experience of the Lords watchful care, Oh taste and see that the Lord is good!

We are children of the same family, and ought therefore to be helpers one of another.
How many helpers has the Christian in the conflict; yet all are strengthened by ONE who is ALWAYS for us!

from George Müller’s Narrative (Pt. 2, 1839)


This verse is, of course, preceded by a section that says ‘there should not be any poor among you,‘ but it’s nice how there’s a failsafe.  Tomorrow is St. Nicholas’s Feast and I was reminded that this season was traditionally an opportunity for charity (I know at least that the Feast of St. Stephen/Boxing Day was generally a time for helping the poor).


Here’s TSO’s For the Sake of Our Brother (which also sneaks in O Come All Ye Faithful) on Youtube and Spotify..

…and here is an image of a galactic collision with a bunch of glowy star-forming regions, naturally, from last year’s Hubble Advent Calendar in The Atlantic. 

Here’s this year’s, if anyone’s interested.

The “First Thanksgiving”

November 28th

Now the Spirit explicitly says that in the latter times some will depart from the faith… They forbid marriage and demand abstinence from foods that God created to be received with gratitude by those who believe and know the truth. For everything created by God is good, and nothing should be rejected if it is received with thanksgiving, since it is sanctified by the word of God and by prayer.

1 Timothy 4:1-5 (HCSB)

…our harvest being gotten in, our governor sent four men on fowling, so we might after a more special manner rejoice together, after we had gathered the fruit of our labors; they four in one day killed as much fowl, as served the company almost a week… many of the Indians coming amongst us, and among the rest their greatest King Massasoit, with some ninety men, whom for three days we entertained and feasted, and they went out and killed five deer, which they brought to the plantation and bestowed on our governor, and upon the captain, and others. And although it be not always so plentiful, as it was this time with us, yet by the goodness of God, we are so far from want, that we often wish you partakers of our plenty.

from Mourt’s Relation (A Letter…)


Like I was going to post anything else.

The story is cliche for a reason, okay? It’s pretty impressive that a bunch of exhausted, starving, persecuted, not-especially-skilled, English peasants managed to land in a completely unfamiliar place, with a wildly different culture, and not get themselves killed.

I mean, half of them died of terrible diseases. But, hey, it was a different time.

On that cheerful note… Happy Thanksgiving?

 

Practicing virtue

November 20th 

…Practice these things; be committed to them, so that your progress may be evident to all. Pay close attention to your life and your teaching; persevere in these things, for in doing this you will save both yourself and your hearers.

1 Timothy 4:15-16 (CSB)

We have an idea that we have to alter things, we [don’t]; we have to remain true to God in the midst of things as they are, to allow things as they are to transmute us. “Things as they are” are the very means God uses to make us into the praise of His glory. We have to live on this sordid earth, amongst human beings who are exactly like ourselves, remembering that it is on this plane we have to work out the marvellous life God has put in us.

The life of a worker is not a hop, skip and a jump affair, it is a squaring of the shoulders, then a steady, steadfast tramp straight through until we get to understand God’s way. It takes the energy of God Himself to prepare a worker for all He wants to make him. We need a spiritual vision of work as well as a spiritual vision of truth. It is not that we go through a certain curriculum and then we are fit to work; preparation and work are so involved that they cannot be separated.

If the worker will obey God’s way he will find he has to be everlastingly delving into the Bible and working it out in circumstances, the two always run together. It requires all the machinery of circumstances to bring a worker where God wants him to be—“co-workers with God.”

from Oswald Chambers’ The Love of God,
The Message of Invincible Consolation (The Worker and Things as They Are) 

The nature of goodness

October 24th

…one came and said to Him, “Good Teacher, what good thing shall I do that I may have eternal life?”

Matthew 19:16 (NKJV)

…the Son no more thought of his own goodness than an honest man thinks of his honesty. When the good man sees goodness, he thinks of his own evil: Jesus had no evil to think of, but neither does he think of his goodness; he delights in his Father’s. ‘Why callest thou me good? None is good save one, even God.

Checked thus, the youth turns to the question which, working in his heart, had brought him running, and made him kneel: what good thing shall he do that he may have eternal life? It is unnecessary to inquire precisely what he meant by eternal life. Whatever shape the thing took to him, that shape represented a something he needed and had not got—a something which, it was clear to him, could be gained only in some path of good. But he thought to gain a thing by a doing, when the very thing desired was a being: he would have that as a possession which must possess him.

The Lord cared neither for isolated truth nor for orphaned deed. It was truth in the inward parts, it was the good heart, the mother of good deeds, he cherished. It was the live, active, knowing, breathing good he came to further. He cared for no speculation in morals or religion. It was good men he cared about, not notions of good things, or even good actions, save as the outcome of life… Could he by one word have set at rest all the questionings of philosophy as to the supreme good and the absolute truth, I venture to say that word he would not have uttered. But he would die to make men good and true. His whole heart would respond to the cry of sad publican or despairing pharisee, ‘How am I to be good?’

It is not with this good thing and that good thing we have to do, but with that power whence comes our power even to speak the word good. We have to do with him to whom no one can look without the need of being good waking up in his heart; to think about him is to begin to be good. To do a good thing is to do a good thing; to know God is to be good. It is not to make us do all things right he cares, but to make us hunger and thirst after a righteousness possessing which we shall never need to think of what is or is not good, but shall refuse the evil and choose the good by a motion of the will which is at once necessity and choice.

from George MacDonald’s Unspoken Sermons (Vol. 2, The Way)

The Gray Martyrdom

Set your affection on things above…

Let me say before the fact (because it’s really not immediately apparent): there is a central theme here. Please, bear with me. I will eventually get to the point, and that point is this: you do not get to choose how you are going to be a witness, you do not get to choose what sort of example you will be.

I can only speak from personal experience (which, by the way, I loathe doing). I know that to any reasonable person —and I try to surround myself with reasonable people— I must seem like a dilettante, unable to focus, to finish things. I hate that. Laziness, of any kind, disgusts me, and it is inexpressibly awful to know that people must think that of me. To paraphrase Chesterton: existential flippancy is something that I happen to despise most of all things, and it is perhaps a wholesome fact that it is the thing of which I am generally accused.

I’m very goal-directed. I like working hard. I like thinking hard. I like the satisfaction of a finished product in my hands. I like learning things. I like helping people understand things. I like completing tasks. I like coming up with solutions. I like doing things — even dumb, tedious things, if the only other option is doing nothing. 

Naturally, I get to do… none of this. There is no one whose nature is less suited to a contemplative, prayer-oriented tradition, and that —along with outreach work that is also a spectacularly bad fit for me— is pretty much exactly what my life has been. Except, of course, I’ve never belonged to an actual monastic Order of any kind, and so it’s even more difficult to explain to people what I do… what I’ve been doing, every day, for most of my adult life, and a fair chunk of my childhood. I’m not complaining, truly, because I see how God has used it (more on that later), but I really can’t emphasize enough how much I hate it. I hate it with the fire of ten million exploding suns, and recognizing how good it has been, both for me and other people, does not make me hate it any less. I don’t know if it ever will.

But you do not get to choose how you witness, you only get to obey… or not.

It’s become near-cliche to discuss the history of the Greek word for witness: martyr. In English, it came to mean someone who gave up their life and, so, kept the faith. There are echoes of the original, wider, meaning of the word in phrases like ‘the Green Martyrdom,” where the witness was that you joined a monastic community and lived separate from the world, building, teaching or learning as those in authority (ugly, unmodern sentiment that) directed. The point behind this phrasing, and the other-colored, later martyrdoms, was that, while they were not as obvious or simple a sacrifice as death, they still required extraordinary sacrifice on a continuing basis. Such ‘martyrs’ were always conscious of the things they had given up —for no worldly reason at all— to be there, wherever ‘there’ was.  The witness of Paul —that it was better for him to stay and build the Church, instead of going to be with the Lord— is the only witness that many Christians are called to give, and I would venture to say that you cannot truly be a red martyr —as Paul, according to tradition, eventually was— if you haven’t been witnessing consistently up until that point. 

It’s easy to compromise that witness though. It’s easy to do useful-seeming work and say you’re serving God and building the kingdom. And maybe you are, in part. God though, knows where we are self-interested even when we don’t. We all tend to avoid sacrifice, and it is so easy to tell ourselves that it isn’t necessary. There is always the temptation to say we’ve obeyed enough, given up enough, and that God should just let us coast for a bit. It never goes away, because God always has something else to teach us, and this means that we are always faced with the choice between clinging to our old ideas simply because they’re ours, or trusting that he knows better. Admitting to God “You’re right, and I’m wrong” always costs. Trying to find a way around that sacrifice never works. There is no better, easier way than the best way. 

Once you’ve learned this (in part, I don’t know that we’re ever truly finished), you start learning it for other people. What you learn is that sometimes there is no way around ‘martyrdom,’ and the loss and difficulty that our brains can only see as unnecessary are, in fact, an essential witness. (I think of it like this concept in thermodynamics that you can’t get more energy out of an engine than you put in, and that, in fact, there is a certain amount of unavoidable loss, even in the most perfect, theoretical engine. There are no perpetual motion machines in spiritual things either. Somewhere, at some point, someone has to put work in, make the sacrifice that seems useless, stupid and unfair, and new life comes out of it.) Jesus is our model for the new people that we’re supposed to be, and his suffering wasn’t punishment, it wasn’t even to fix anything that was wrong with him. He wasn’t obligated; nobody made him. He had no practical thing he could point to that explained why he was doing what he was doing. He just obeyed his Father and his God.

Jesus was the model for all the martyrs that came after him. When a Christian dies, knowingly, for the sake of the gospel, it tells people that there is something more valuable than life as we know it. This testimony can be denied, or explained away, but it can’t be undone. You have quite literally put your treasure in heaven where your mouth is, and it makes no sense whatsoever. Don’t let anyone tell you that it does. People die for all kinds of causes, all the time, and that is dumb. It may also be beautiful, or inspiring, or ‘en-couraging’ to those of us who survive, but it is, first and foremost, incredibly stupid. The wisdom of the cross is foolishness, and it will never add up if we only consider the earthly half of the equation. 

Here’s the really difficult part though: every other martyrdom requires the same thing; we learn to sacrifice practical, material value for what God values and says is Real. 

I know that God takes pity on us sometimes. He helps us to understand that he’ll take care of us in practical ways: ‘See, I could have lied about that check, and I didn’t, and God gave me money to pay my rent anyway” etc.  That’s wonderful; I’m not being all mystical and weird here. The man who turned water into wine, and multiplied fish and bread does not have a problem with concrete examples. My point is that they’re just examples and not what really matters.

Yes, God gives us good things, that’s his heart and his ultimate intention. So sometimes helping people makes you feel good. Sometimes being kind and honest turns out to be good business. Sometimes God simply gives us what we ask for because he’s nice. Sometimes you obediently do the right thing that seems stupid (I mean, really, really, deeply stupid) and it magically works out. Sometimes all the hours, weeks, years, you diligently put in at that hateful job has helped you build skills that you really enjoy using somewhere else. But knowing the God who does those things is the reward, not anything we “get” out of it. When we fail to recognize this, we learn it the hard way.

For me, this ‘God is the reward’ thing has had to apply to pretty much everything, because I’m a practical kind of person, and I find it easy to adapt my hopes and wants to whatever situation I happen to be in. If I could have, in good conscience, spent literally any appreciable amount of my time and energy on my own goals and what I thought was important, I don’t think I’d have gotten it. It’s hard to admit that, because there are still times when it all feels like a waste, when I don’t choose to look at what God values. I don’t think I could have learned any other way though. The ugly fact is that if I’m left with any way to rationalize things my thought process goes something like: ‘Well, obviously, I can’t do the wrong thing, and if I do the right thing, it’s not so bad. I guess I can manage it. It’s not fair, but it’s sort of… the cost of doing spiritual business, or something. At least I got ‘X’ out of it.’

Well. Sometimes it is so bad. Sometimes you don’t get anything out of it. Sometimes (usually) knowing that you’ve done the right thing is no satisfaction. Sometimes there will never be any payoff. Sometimes it costs you everything. All the time. No exceptions. Constantly. For all the control and satisfaction you have in your life, you might as well be dead.

This also does not make sense. It makes as little sense as any other martyrdom. And that’s okay. More than that, it’s right.

Because if you truly believe that this is just the beginning of life, that God, and nothing or no one else, is your source of joy, that God is just and that he rewards whoever goes after him, then none of that matters. Just like the martyrs don’t care whether they happen to be in Part I or II of Eternity.

I’m not saying this is easy. But it’s very clear. Every sacrifice should make you think about what you’re really working for and where you’re storing up value. It’s not just okay, it’s good to ask whether it’s all worth it. As long as we’re honest and we always answer yes. 

Please, please don’t misunderstand me.  I’m not making any comparisons between lives, or saying that dying for your beliefs is somehow easy. That’s just stupid. Dying is hard and horrible; no one wants to be in that situation, and those of us who haven’t been confronted with that choice can’t say much about it. What I’m saying is that, conceptually, it‘s the same problem. The same philosophical question confronts you whether you give up your life bit by bit or all at once. …and I’m not saying that simply pissing your life down the drain automatically means that you’re serving God. There are plenty of ways that I’ve wasted my time, either because I was exhausted and felt entitled, or because I had my own stubborn ideas about what was worthwhile and sacrificed God’s goals for my own. That’s on me. I trust that God will bring good out of bad on that score, but that doesn’t mean that it wasn’t bad. 

But if you are truly doing what you believe God wants, it doesn’t matter whether you think it’s worthwhile (and, helpful hint, some part of you at least probably won’t). If our values and God’s values don’t line up, guess who needs to change? (Another hint: the answer is never ‘God.’)

So if God has some ineffable plan that requires you to essentially sit in a lotus position for a decade, then that is the categorical Best Way to spend your time and you’d better sit your ass down. Don’t argue. Don’t kick and scream. It’ll just take longer, or hurt more, probably both. I know this must sound like complaining, but most of it isn’t (‘most,’ I say, because I’m still human). You have to have been there, I think, to recognize that everything can be genuinely horrible, and be completely beyond endurance —past the point where you can even realize that a thing may not last and that might be any kind of hope beyond it— and that it simply doesn’t matter because… God.

This also makes no sense.

Please know that I’m not just saying this, I’ve done it. This has been drafted on my heart. I have put the actual time in; there are no two-minute training montages in the kingdom of heaven. It was awful, as I said before, and I will never pretend that it wasn’t. I hope, with all the compassion I’ve learned, that God doesn’t put you through it; it’s quite literally excruciating, and, worse, the possibility for failure is astronomically high, but if that’s what it takes, I want you to know that it is worth it. He is always, always worth it.

Every eye

October 4th 

The heart knows its own bitterness, and no stranger shares its joy.

Proverbs 14:10 (ESV)

Truth is truth, whether from the lips of Jesus or Balaam. But, in its deepest sense, the truth is a condition of heart, soul, mind, and strength towards God and towards our fellow—not an utterance, not even a right form of words; and therefore such truth coming forth in words is, in a sense, the person that speaks.

…each man has his peculiar relation to God. He is made after his own fashion, and that of no one else; for when he is perfected he shall receive the new name which no one else can understand. Hence he can worship God as no man else can worship him — can understand God as no man else can understand him. This or that man may understand God more, may understand God better than he, but no other man can understand God as he understands him. As the fir-tree lifts up itself with a far different need from the need of the palm-tree, so does each man stand before God, and lift up a different humanity to the common Father. And for each God has a different response. In every man there is a loneliness, an inner chamber of peculiar [unique] life into which God only can enter.

From this it follows that there is a chamber also—(O God, humble and accept my speech)—a chamber in God himself, into which none can enter but the one, the individual— out of which chamber that man has to bring revelation and strength for his brethren. This is that for which he was made—to reveal the secret things of the Father.

By his creation, then, each man is isolated with God; each, in respect of his peculiar making, can say, “my God;” each can come to him alone, and speak with him face to face, as a man speaketh with his friend. There is no massing of men with God. When he speaks of gathered men, it is as a spiritual body, not a mass. For in a body every smallest portion is individual, and therefore capable of forming a part of the body.

But is there not the worst of all dangers involved in such teaching— the danger of spiritual pride?” If there be, are we to refuse the spirit for fear of the pride? Or is there any other deliverance from pride except the spirit? Pride springs from supposed success in the high aim: with attainment itself comes humility. But here there is no room for ambition. Ambition is the desire to be above one’s neighbour; and here there is no possibility of comparison with one’s neighbour: no one knows what the white stone contains except the man who receives it. Relative worth is not only unknown—to the children of the kingdom it is unknowable. Each esteems the other better than himself.

Gone then will be all anxiety as to what his neighbour may think about him. It is enough that God thinks about him. To be something to God—is not that praise enough? To be a thing that God cares for and would have complete for himself, because it is worth caring for—is not that life enough?

from George MacDonald’s Unspoken Sermons
(Vol. 1, The New Name)


Contrary to all appearances, not actually a weird translation of Kierkegaard.